|
Post by cjm on Feb 16, 2017 9:30:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by neels on Feb 16, 2017 20:22:09 GMT
Not a word of this in the NT Times, Washington Post or CNN. I wonder why??
|
|
|
Post by cjm on Feb 16, 2017 21:43:40 GMT
Not a word of this in the NT Times, Washington Post or CNN. I wonder why?? It seems that the are disputing the accuracy of the research. ... Relying on the CCES responses to citizenship questions, ODU team estimated that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in the 2008 election. They presented a range as low as 38,000 and as high at 2.8 million. The CCES authors at Harvard, Amherst and YouGov reacted with outrage. They said the small number of respondents among a sample of 38,000 people made the answers meaningless. They picked at their numbers, declared them unreliable and concluded that zero noncitizens voted. Their rebuttal prompted the liberal media to proclaim the ODU study “debunked” even though those professors stick by their work and have filed counter-rebuttals. The 2013 Hispanic Survey tends to confirm the ODU work and chief defender, professor Jesse Richman. The Hispanic Survey’s 13 percent registration rate is right in line with what the CCES data indicates in multiple elections. Mr. Agresti said the ODU paper found that in 2008, 2010 and 2012 between 14.5 percent and 15.6 percent of self-declared non-citizen adults were registered to vote. In other words, the CCES and National Hispanic Survey, done with different sample sizes, align. Still, the liberal media declares the ODU work “debunked.” ...
|
|