Post by cjm on Jun 24, 2023 9:51:28 GMT
Generative AI is a minefield for copyright law
Some tentative thoughts (expressed as facts, but being questions rather):
Work published on the internet is lost to the originator. Its potential exists as a form of advertising for the creator. Work specially commissioned (perhaps even by revenue earning websites) is probably the only certain revenue stream. Within these constraints, not to use the internet is probably the only safe avenue for artistic expression. Paywalls are another possibility, but to get known first, that is the problem. Then perhaps upcoming artists are not entitled to remuneration as they, after all, are leeching on the unsuspecting public?
Some tentative thoughts (expressed as facts, but being questions rather):
Work published on the internet is lost to the originator. Its potential exists as a form of advertising for the creator. Work specially commissioned (perhaps even by revenue earning websites) is probably the only certain revenue stream. Within these constraints, not to use the internet is probably the only safe avenue for artistic expression. Paywalls are another possibility, but to get known first, that is the problem. Then perhaps upcoming artists are not entitled to remuneration as they, after all, are leeching on the unsuspecting public?
